Note that due to changes in measure definition and methodology, including the method used for case mix adjustment, not all years are directly comparable and year-on-year comparisons should be made with caution.
Starting from 2017, we report outlier analysis and other analysis using a “no imputation” approach. By this we mean that proportions of adherence to standards, or proportions of clinical outcomes are described for the babies where the outcome is known. Numbers of patients with missing data are presented alongside clinical data. This means that results from 2017 onwards may not be directly comparable with results from 2014-2016 as displayed in the annual report, unit and network data sections and poster downloads. In previous years missing data were counted as negative outcomes or non-adherence to standards. All outlier data and longitudinal outlier data (available from 2015 to 2019) are reported using the “no imputation” approach for all years, so are comparable. You can use the longitudinal outlier analysis section to consider change in unit and network performance for a selection of NNAP measures.
For the measures BPD or death and Mortality until discharge home, the matching variables and methods of adjustment are different between previous years’ analysis, so the treatment effects cannot be directly compared.
For more information about the NNAP methodology, please see the NNAP Methodology and Statistical Analysis Plan, available at: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/nnap-data-flow-methodology